tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post841920780932424091..comments2023-10-10T05:07:13.577-07:00Comments on En Tequila Es Verdad: Happy Hour DiscursoDana Hunterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00890312745525306991noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-57606255068314454492009-10-04T06:38:57.510-07:002009-10-04T06:38:57.510-07:00"another global warming column ... took him d...<i>"another global warming column ... took him down with a baseball metaphor."</i><br /><br />What an odd coincidence. Just a couple of days ago, my disreputable Con relative sent me a "GW denier unfairly censored!" <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/25/science/earth/25epa.html" rel="nofollow">concern troll piece in the New York Times</a>, which mainly seemed to be about <a href="http://www.epa.gov/foia/docs/Endangerment_comments_v7b.pdf" rel="nofollow">this document</a> -- which I <a href="http://www.issuepedia.org/2009-03-16_Comments_on_EPA_DTS_Document/woozle" rel="nofollow">took down in three strikes</a> because I didn't have time for all seven.<br /><br />Looking at the George Will debunking, I notice that Will's article is based on one by the NYT's Andy Revkin... hmm, that name sounds <a href="http://www.issuepedia.org/Special:Search?search=revkin&go=Go" rel="nofollow">familiar</a>... this guy is the <i>climate reporter</i> for a major well-respected paper??<br /><br />But I'm sure it was just a momentary lapse of judgment on someone's part; no need to go looking for any systematic patterns of denial in the mainstream media. Nope. They're just doing their job the best they can. Move along, citizens, and return to your duties; there is nothing to see here.Woozlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17948248776908775080noreply@blogger.com