tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post8725977581671816938..comments2023-10-10T05:07:13.577-07:00Comments on En Tequila Es Verdad: In This Case, Gonna Have to Say "Down With the Revolution!"Dana Hunterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00890312745525306991noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-27515082539368221672011-08-06T11:41:23.704-07:002011-08-06T11:41:23.704-07:00But what if Google is approaching this from a diff...But what if Google is approaching this from a different viewpoint? You may choose to be publicly anonymous/pseudonymous, but since the government can compel them to turn over any identifying information they have, the anonymity/pseudonymity is only a charade. Google knows that they have to play by the laws of the nation in which they operate, and that may mean being unable to protect anonymity/pseudonymity. Who would you blame if they turned over identifying information about you? Google or the government? You'd blame Google for not keeping your secret.<br /><br />My take on the real name thing is that Google doesn't want to promise protection that it can't deliver.Ron Schotthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10020094512548523216noreply@blogger.com