tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post9117452587160986953..comments2023-10-10T05:07:13.577-07:00Comments on En Tequila Es Verdad: Note to Hillary: Get the Fuck Over ItDana Hunterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00890312745525306991noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-32980581527659394242008-06-26T16:23:00.000-07:002008-06-26T16:23:00.000-07:00Sorry for posting so late on this, Dana. (I just f...Sorry for posting so late on this, Dana. (I just found your site through PZ's Pharyngula).<BR/><BR/>I think you are 100% correct. What disturbs the hell out of me is that so few of the Hillary contingent didn't seem much bothered that a person (or campaign), who can't read the writing on the wall (or the chiseled words in stone) over a period of several MONTHS, and who thereby placed her campaign into a financial situation similar to what the country is experiencing now because of the OTHER ostrich who sees nothing but visions in HIS head (because it's in a hole), can possibly be construed as a competent heads-up leader.<BR/><BR/>We already HAVE one of those. How can they justify wanting more of that?<BR/><BR/>Meanwhile, Obama for decent motives as well as strategic ones, no doubt, as since offered to help her out financially.<BR/><BR/>YET, a poll result released today shows that about a quarter of Hillary supporters are so miffed or so creeped out at the prospect of having a black man with a strange name in the White House that they have declared their preference for that flip-flopping incompetent crash-prone navy pilot with the endearing marble-filled smile.<BR/><BR/>Oh, and as for PC's comment at the head of this thread? Funny that it should mention that Hillary's position hasn't changed, when McCain's position changes as often as there are issues.<BR/><BR/>From what I've read, I'm delighted to be a devoted reader from now on. Keep it up.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-80393565410030411872008-06-06T08:07:00.000-07:002008-06-06T08:07:00.000-07:00@Karen: Too fucking right! Although we're losing ...@Karen: Too fucking right! Although we're losing a prime opportunity for an awesome bumper sticker (courtesy of Garrett):<BR/><BR/>"It takes a Clinton to clean up after a Bush"<BR/><BR/>Or something like that. 'Twas funny. Not funny enough to deal with Hillary's drama. I wish her followers would get one important point: it's not misogyny unless you define "misogyny" as "misogynistic towards one specific woman."<BR/><BR/>As my stepmother once said, "It would be great to have a woman in the White House. Just not that one."<BR/><BR/>@NP - Which animals did your sister-in-law have in mind?Dana Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00890312745525306991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-26410815323383576062008-06-05T16:15:00.000-07:002008-06-05T16:15:00.000-07:00Not only has Hilary displayed un-sportsman like co...Not only has Hilary displayed un-sportsman like conduct, her supporters are crying national misogyny. As far as I'm concerned the Clintons have served their country and it's time for new blood.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-18189714714855722492008-06-05T07:39:00.000-07:002008-06-05T07:39:00.000-07:00I think my sister-in-law has the right idea--get r...I think my sister-in-law has the right idea--get rid of the people and let the animals take over things again.NPhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01971083012537277697noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-34505500210116464362008-06-05T02:10:00.000-07:002008-06-05T02:10:00.000-07:00@PC: The reason some (not all) liberals have turne...@PC: The reason some (not all) liberals have turned on Hillary is that she's displayed a rather disturbing Republicon streak. By this, I mean her inability to separate reality from fantasy, her tendency to resort to dirty tricks and cry prejudice when she's not getting her way, and her utterly pathological need for power. Those things were not in evidence, or at least not as glaringly obvious, before she ran for President. Her positions have no bearing on the matter. We assess not only a person's positions, but a person's conduct. I hope this answers your question. It's rather sad you didn't get this from the post, but then again, I wouldn't be all that surprised if you hadn't read past the headline, judging from the general quality of your comments lately.<BR/><BR/>@Webs: Seconded.Dana Hunterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00890312745525306991noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-74267796939563158952008-06-04T13:15:00.000-07:002008-06-04T13:15:00.000-07:00Great job of not only insulting all liberals, but ...Great job of not only insulting <B>all</B> liberals, but also lumping all of us into the same group. Congrats on telling me why I do not have to listen to you.Webshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02919958450902834554noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6851578517872251953.post-43877274666845315332008-06-04T08:22:00.000-07:002008-06-04T08:22:00.000-07:00I don't understand the way libs have turned on her...I don't understand the way libs have turned on her. Two years ago she was your darling. Her positions haven't changed.I don't get it.Mike at The Big Stickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11510309563965977831noreply@blogger.com