But, Jan sez, she'll allocate $10 mil or so to cover psych meds. Well, that's nice, Jan. Too bad you're cutting out all the other services that go along with the meds. You don't seem to realize that it's not just a matter of chucking pills down people's throats. Meds have to be prescribed, they have to be monitored, they have to be adjusted, they stop working and have to be changed, above all they have to be taken. Funny thing about mental illness, paranoid people often won't swallow the pills you hand them.All over TV today, I'm hearing the gasbags fret about the fact that Obama hasn't brought up gun control. It's a good question, but they know the answer to it very well: the Democrats have given up that issue, the only problem is that the Republicans refuse to accept their surrender. They have nothing more to say about it.
I'm more curious about why they aren't all over this:Gov. Jan Brewer's plan to roll back state Medicaid coverage would leave thousands of Arizona's most mentally fragile without health care.
An estimated 5,200 people diagnosed with a serious mental illness and thousands more who qualify for other behavioral-health services would be among 280,000 childless adults losing health-care coverage under the governor's plan.
Without intensive monitoring, without counseling appointments, and without a support system that will help these poor ill people get well enough to achieve some level of function, you might as well be hosing them down with homeopathy for all the good it will do.
Just like with transplants, Jan Brewer doesn't get it. Jan Brewer doesn't care. That's the takeaway lesson here, people: do not get sick in Arizona, because Jan Brewer doesn't care if you suffer and die. She and her merry band of fucktards do not believe the great state of Arizona needs to waste its money on you.
Suzanne left a comment on the last installment I want to make sure all of you see:
very well said dana. in the past, i've had to try to navigate the california mental health system for family and friends in addition to my experiences on the pd.And that was in California, which according to some was a socialist paradise.
even before the draconian cuts that have happened in ca, the cops had to determine that the person was (1) a danger to themselves (suicidal); or (2) a danger to others (homicidal); or (3) gravely disabled (ie dementia/alzheimer) in order to place an involuntary 72 hour psychiatric hold. the patient would then be transported by ambulance to the county contracted mental health facility where the docs would either agree or disagree.
more times than i can recount, if ya didn't have good insurance, that 72 hour hold was ignored the patient would be discharged early -- many times later that same day.
it is heartbreaking what is happening to our safety net in the country.
its not that easy -- and it is being made harder and harder each and every day.
If you want to see what the Republican ideal of health care is, watch Arizona. And consider carefully whether that's what you want for this country the next time you go to the ballot box.
Well, that's nice, Jan. Too bad you're cutting out all the other services that go along with the meds. You don't seem to realize that it's not just a matter of chucking pills down people's throats. Meds have to be prescribed, they have to be monitored, they have to be adjusted, they stop working and have to be changed, above all they have to be taken. Funny thing about mental illness, paranoid people often won't swallow the pills you hand them.
ReplyDeletePerhaps the saddest thing about that assessment is that you don't have to know anyone personally who has that problem to find it out. I did about an hour's research when I wrote this, which involved reading the manufacturer's instructions, to figure out that yes, what I'd been told second hand really was true.