Oh, yes, my darlings. That's delicious, isn't it? Tuck your napkin under your chin and go sink your teeth in to this bit of yum: "The defeat of Flood geology by Flood geology." It's eleven meaty pages of pure, savory, gourmet geo-goodness.
Really, all you need to do is grab Figure 1 and print it. Carry it with you. It's got everything neatly laid out, with little icons showing what bit of evidence says that the whole entire earth couldn't have been underwater at that time. And remember, this is evidence creationist geologists have found through their own research.
Here's my own quick-and-dirty summary:
Subaerial deposits - raindrop impressions, dessication cracks, continental basalts, in-situ root beds, dinosaur eggs, glaciation, fossil charcoal, eolian dunes, paleosol, trackways.When you plot where examples of all of the above are found on a handy geologic timescale, you end up eliminating every bit of it, except for the Hadean Eon. It just doesn't work. It can't work.
Low- energy deposits and long pass ages of time: Cretaceous chalk, algal growths, various sea critter beds, reefs, lacrustine (lake) deposits, fluvial (stream or river) deposits.
Diversification of terrestrial animals: "Because such speciation cannot occur during a single year when the entire planet is underwater and during most of which the relevant animals are dead, [flood geologist S.J. Robinson] argued that the entire post-Carboniferous portion of the geologic column must be post-Flood."
The Mountains of Ararat: can't have Noah landing there if they don't exist, and any flood deposits would have to be on top of them, so, uh, y'know, it was some other mountains of Ararat!
And some of them know it:
So what's a Flood geologist to do?In the words of Flood geologist Max Hunter (2009:88), “It is somewhat ironic…that, almost a half century after publication of The Genesis Flood by Whitcomb and Morris in 1961, the geologic record attributed to the Genesis Flood is currently being assailed on all sides by diluvialists…[and] there remains not one square kilometer of rock at the earth’s surface that is indisputably Flood deposited.”
The continued denial of the implications of their own findings is an example of what I call the gorilla mindset: the attitude that if something looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but religious dogma says it is a gorilla, then it is a gorilla.
According to Flood geologists, this is a gorilla. |
Yup. Pretty much. And these poor inane souls are going to be at GSA, shouting "Gorilla! It's a gorilla!" every time you show them a duck.
Show them Figure 1, and they might just cry.
Kindof like this comic which I gleefully showed Woozle the other day, yes?
ReplyDeleteRick Perry comparing himself to Galileo? Well I guess it's as pathetic anyway...
ReplyDeleteSigh. I attend (soon will be alumna of) an institution where a semi-famous flood geologist got his MS. Mention the name, and current long-resident faculty members will flinch. Perhaps they'll need to flinch less in the future.
ReplyDeleteUmmm... flat-earthers? Maybe?
ReplyDeleteSeriously, there's nothing sadder than any of these pathetic Biblical literalist types. Nothing that they have to say conforms to anything observable by even the most casual hobbyist.
Do you think we can buy them all ice cream cones and get them to give it up?
So, do gorillas have beaks or bills?
ReplyDelete