If I didn't care about the future of my country, I'd vote for McCain just for the entertainment value. He's a bottomless well of inanity.
Case in point: his recent statements on Iran.
Time Magazine's Joe Klein, who has been
taken to the woodshed more than once by
Glenn Greenwald, indulged in some journalism that should earn him a cookie. He's indulged in some political snark that should earn him a trip to Disneyland.
Go read the column for the snark: we're dealing only in the business here:
On Friday, I promised to check into whether Obama had ever said that he would negotiate--specifically, by name--with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Indeed, according to the crack Time Magazine research department and the Obama campaign, he never has. He did say that he would negotiate with the Iranian leadership--but, on matters of foreign policy and Iran's nuclear program, the guy in charge is the Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. As of today, John McCain was still accusing Obama of wanting to negotiate with Ahmadinejad. Why doesn't the McCain campaign and other assorted Republicans ever accuse Obama of wanting to negotiate with Khamenei? Well, because Khamenei isn't quite the flagrant anti-Semite Ahmadinejad is...and, as we keep hearing, Obama has a Jewish
problem.
Ye gods, Joe, what's
wrong with you? Fact-checking? Accurate reporting? Has
Faux News taught you nothing? This looks suspiciously like reporting, something many
bloggers were convinced you'd given up on.
I checked his facts, my darlings, and he is absolutely correct:
Ahmadinejad isn't the totalitarian leader of Iran that he's portrayed to be by the so-wrong Right. (As to
Obama never mentioning
Ahmadinejad by name, I don't have a crack research department, so I'll have to take that one on trust, along with never having seen
Obama quoted as saying he'd negotiate with
Ahmadinejad. Don't burn me, Joe.)
John McCain, on the other hand, doesn't seem to have access to
Wikipedia, and in another startling episode of actual journalism, Joe Klein - the same Joe Klein who was soundly beaten for
dumbassitude by Glenn
Greenwald just a week ago - caught him out:
3 comments:
"John McCain, on the other hand, doesn't seem to have access to Wikipedia...."
Many times, the elderly are wary of technology like the Internet and telephones. You can't blame him--all those new-fangled gadgets are a little overwhelming when he's used to the peace and quiet of an evening at home with the misses after dinner with the Flintstones.
1. Objective facts, such as who the chief executive of a country is, can be disagreed with.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias" - S. Colbert
That's why true conservatives only read Conservapedia, which is immune to dangerously biased reality.
Post a Comment